The Smoking Ban In Condos Movement Lights Up Again

A movement to ban smoking in condos is heating up again. Fort Lauderdale developer, Dennis Eisinger does not allow smoking in the common areas of his buildings nor in the parking garage, balconies or inside the units themselves, according to the Daily Business Review. The movement is spreading South as well… we noticed this week that Biscayne Beach will also be a 100% smoke-free building.

Here is the section of the Biscayne Beach Rules & Regulations that deals with smoking:

Under Mr. Eisinger’s plan, condo developers retain the right to prohibit smoking in the buildings they sell, and existing buildings have an opportunity to decide for themselves to go smoke-free. A 75% condo board agreement would change the building bylaws and deem lighting up a violation. “Smokers are not a protected class,” Mr. Eisinger told the Daily Business Review, referring to the federal Fair Housing Act.

Why This Is An Amazing Idea

To be honest, Biscayne Beach’s choice to prohibit makes a lot of sense. Below all of the units is the restaurant and beach club. I highly doubt the patrons of the restaurant and the beach club members would appreciate being hit with a stray cigarette while they enjoy their fruity drinks by the pool. I certainly wouldn’t.

In addition, every single building manager I have spoken with has complained at one point or another about cigarettes ruining the pool furniture and starting fires on balconies below. In Infinity, there was actually a fire a couple of years back on a balcony when a cigarette butt hit a patio cushion and it burned. I was also hit in the head recently while swimming with my baby in the pool. Thank goodness it was my hair that got singed and not the baby’s. Scary.

Smoking inside the apartments causes its own form of damage. Smoke smell is not a selling feature. I’ve routinely seen tenants and buyers alike dismiss a property because of the smell. Speaking also from the standpoint of a landlord’s representative, the smell is nearly impossible to get out. The apartments always have to be repainted, the air conditioner units deep cleaned and sometimes the flooring and window shades even need to be changed. This cost quickly adds up and exceeds the security deposit that landlords hold. Not a great investment.

Aside from the inconvenience to others, affect on market values and danger of burns, I think the CDC has appropriately made their point and convinced everyone that smoking is hazardous to your health and to the health of those around you.

But Are The Buildings Overstepping Their Power?

Despite the reasons why buildings SHOULD go smoke-free, can the condo association really dictate what people do inside of the properties that they own? Or is that an example of association over-control?

Also, how could it really be enforced? Would there be a cigarette-gestapo to make sure that people follow the rules? I would love to find out who threw that cigarette off the balcony and hit me in the head, but I recognize that I will never know.

What are your thoughts? Should more buildings adopt similar rules, or is Mr. Eisinger’s plan a pie in the sky? Here is a link to his full interview with the Daily Business Review, including a video.

Market Stat Monday: Which Brickell Buildings Are The Most Popular For Buyers?

During our Market Stat Monday series, I’ve started to notice a trend that there is an increasing amount of competition between condo listings for a smaller amount of buyers in the market. This led me to become curious if there are any buildings in the that are more popular among the active buyers, and some of the results are surprising!

First, we have to acknowledge the harsh reality that we have seen only 175 closed sales in the neighborhood this year. With 1,413 active listings, that amounts to over 40 months of inventory on the market JUST in the Brickell resale market. When pulling my data, I only looked at resales, not developer inventory. If you add in the developer inventory, there will be even more months of inventory.

The sellers who were able to sell did so for a neighborhood average of $389/square foot.

I was pleasantly surprised to see that IconBrickell’s Tower 3 has been a stand-out so far this year. They have seen 13 closed sales despite losing their hotel program (which I think creates an opportunity for owners). Seven of those sales took place in April, telling me that the investors agree.

Another popular option has been The Club at Brickell Bay, who saw 12 closings with an average price per square foot of $299/square foot. I am not aware of anything out of the ordinary that would cause The Club to be such a good buy right now, aside from the fact that the layouts and location are good and the price is right.

1060 Brickell has also had a good year. There have been 11 total closed sales at a rate of $346/square foot. Our statistics page only reports 9 sales, but that is because we have separated the project into the east and west tower.

I was not surprised to see Icon Brickell’s Tower 1 on the list. Buyers nearly always ask about IconBrickell, despite fears regarding their pool construction. Also, Tower 1 is one of the densest towers in town, with 712 total apartments, so it makes sense that there should be more transactions.

Brickell on the River’s South tower made the list with 10 sales, and that sort of makes sense to me. The building is well-run and the loft-layouts are unique. I typically advise investors to purchase a 1 bedroom in the South tower, but if they are looking for a 2 bedroom, to buy in the North tower. This is because the 1 bedroom plans rent far easier in the South tower because of their loft layout, but the 2 bedroom loft layouts lose a lot of potential tenants because of the lack of privacy from the bedrooms. Since there is competition from newer buildings these days for tenants, you want your investment to appeal to as many people as possible and the 2 bedroom lofts don’t work well for roommate situations or families. The price is also right, averaging $297/square foot.

Speaking of loft layouts, Infinity at Brickell is also on the list with 8 sales at an average of $319/square foot. I remember back in the day when people would complain about the developer selling apartments at Infinity for $255/square foot. Those were the days. A lot of people are under the misconception that Infinity no longer has views because of the construction of SLS Brickell next door. While it is true that SLS blocked some views, most of the units still have at least some bay views and the 00 and 02 lines still have a lot of bay views. Infinity is still one of my favorite buildings, the staff is very friendly and professional, the layouts are nice and since the building is so well-maintained, it does not look like it is about to be 10 years old.  At $319/square foot, that is a great bargain for what you get.

One building that really surprised me was BrickellHouse. It didn’t make it into the top 10, but there were 5 sales this year averaging $474/square foot! That is a lot lower than the $600/foot price the original buyers paid, but is still a great number for a building that is probably about to have a special assessment that will make you do a double take and recount those zeros. On the bright side, they did finally find a solution to their parking debacle, so at least we’re moving forward.

Here is the full top10 list of Brickell buildings by transaction count:

Icon Brickell Tower 3 – 13 sales – $412/square foot average
The Club at Brickell Bay – 12 sales – $299/square foot average
1060 Brickell – 11 sales – $346/square foot average
Icon Brickell Tower 1 – 10 sales – $517/square foot average
Brickell on the River South Tower – 10 sales – $297/square foot average
Infinity at Brickell – 8 sales – $319/square foot average
VUE at Brickell – 7 sales – $289/square foot average
Plaza at Brickell East – 6 sales – $462/square foot average
Plaza at Brickell West – 6 sales –  $411/square foot average
Neo Vertika – 6 sales – $317/square foot average

Are you surprised by any of the findings?

Market Stat Monday: Brickell on the River North

After a few weeks in the Miami Riverfront and Edgewater areas, we’re going to jump back to Brickell for this week’s Market Stat Monday and look into Brickell on the River’s North tower. For the Brickell newbies out there, Brickell on the River was built in 2006 and has 2 towers that share an amenity deck and parking garage, but aside from that are very much different.

The north tower was the first to be built. It has 42 stories and a contemporary feel. The lobby is marble with wooden accents and the condos are all flat, with sizes varying from 1 bedrooms up to 3 bedrooms. The condo association has recently completed a face-lift to the hallways and lobby. I have always viewed this tower as a great option for both end users and investors alike since it has such a great mix of qualities that are attractive to most anyone. Once the north tower was complete, work began on the south tower, that was completed in 2007. The south tower has 46 floors and features a more modern design with duplex lofts rather than the flat apartments with separated bedrooms.

One of the big selling features of Brickell on the River lately has been the fact that it is the only building in Brickell that is approved for FHA financing. Sadly, I have to announce that this approval has expired, but conventional financing is still available.

Even without the FHA approval, the north tower hasn’t been performing to badly lately. There have been 5 closed sales this year with an average price per square foot of $350. One thing that is interesting is the fact that of the 5 recent closings, two have been REO deals (foreclosures). Unit 2503 is a 1 bedroom that closed for a paltry $239,925, which worked out to $309/square foot. Before you go crazy about this ridiculously low-priced sale, you also have to acknowledge that this particular sale seems to have squatters, which are the buyer’s responsibility. The listing noted that the property was occupied and no interior inspections were available… meaning the property cannot be seen in person. That’s pretty hardcore.

In a less dramatic deal, unit 4019 is a two bedroom that closed for $370,000. This one was a Homepath deal, a foreclosure that was taken back by Fannie Mae. I saw this property in person and it was in great shape. It needed only some drapes and was ready to move-in. Someone got a very good deal. That unit would rent for $2,450/month by my estimates.

As for non-distressed sales, we saw a 1 bedroom trade for $330,000 ($365/square foot), and then a two bedroom corner unit that sold for $407,500 ($367/ft). On the 39th floor, a 2 bedroom with 2 parking spaces closed for $415,000.

Overall, the sellers who closed their units accepted 93% of their desired price, staying in line with the rates of negotiation we are seeing in other buildings.

There are currently 3 contracts pending in the building. One is a short sale that was listed for $360,000 for a two bedroom. This one has to be considered an outlier because who knows whether it will get approved and the buyer has to pay the seller’s closing and legal costs. There’s no telling how much that will amount to!

Units 1603 and 2403 are both one bedroom plans and are asking $299,900 and $299,000 respectively. We have also just listed apartment 803 for $283,000, so expect to see an offer come through very quickly!

Aside from apartment 803, there are 33 total active sales in the building. While that does work out to 33 months of inventory at the rate that closings are coming, it is also only 9% of the total units. That is a far better situation than some of the other buildings in the area.

One bedrooms start at $255,000 up to $325,000. Two bedrooms are between $384,000 to $485,000 aside from one two bedroom listing that is a short sale offered for $308,000. I can’t believe we’re talking about short sales again! Even with the short sales and foreclosures that are being marketed, since financing is still possible, I would still consider Brickell on the River North to be a relatively healthy building in this market.

On the rental side, we have seen 24 rented apartments in the last months with an average price of $2.33/square foot. One bedrooms range from $1,850-$2,100, two bedrooms from $2,300-$2,750 and 3 bedrooms around $3,400/month. The average marketing time is 46 days and owners are garnering 96% of their asking price. It is also important to make note that most of the rentals are transacting for the asking price, especially in the lower price points. Furnished rentals tend to be a bit more flexible since they are more challenging to fill, but the unfurnished units are not budging in price.

Current rental availability ranges from $2,150/month-$2,375/month for one bedrooms, $2,500/month-$2,850/month for two bedrooms and $3,200/month-$3,500/month for three bedrooms.

Market Stat Monday: 1800 Club

Last week, we had the first official installment of the Market Stat Monday series. We checked in on Quantum on the Bay, which is in the process of overcoming some legal battles. One of our readers suggested that we skip next door this week and look into the less dramatic yet equally beautiful 1800 Club, so here we are.

For those who are new to 1800 Club, it was built in 2007 and has 469 apartments within 42 stories. It is a full-service building, pretty much standard to the area. The amenities include pools, gym, 24 hour doorman, valet, and a party room. The building is quite lovely and is also well-kept. It was actually one of the few buildings in the market to earn FHA approval, so FHA buyers could purchase there with low down payment loans. That approval is notoriously difficult for condo buildings, and sadly it expired for 1800 Club in 2014, but the fact that it was achieved speaks volumes of how the building is run. Today, the FHA certification has not been renewed, but there are conventional mortgage programs that allow up to 95% financing on purchases in the building.

There are currently 32 active listings for sale, so 7% of the total units are available for purchase. The average price per foot ranges more drastically than most buildings. The lowest-priced unit is listed for $295/square foot and the highest price per foot is $511/square foot. If you’re curious why the gap in pricing is so large, it is because the units in this building have a very different mix of layouts and views. Apartments on the east side of the building have direct bay views, apartments on the west side have sunset views and those located on the south side of the building have partial bay views but also look into the nearly-completed Aria on the Bay. Also, all of the one bedroom plans have either the west view or south view. There is one line that has two bedrooms and a west view, but most of the two bedrooms have south or east views. Because the layouts and views are so starkly different, I’ve decided to pull the statistics for each segment of the building.

WEST FACING UNITS

There are currently 7 units on the market that face west. These have beautiful sunset views and the asking price averages $380/square foot. The least expensive is apartment 2902, an 841 square foot 1 bedroom that is offered for $278,900 and includes a $2,000 credit toward new floors (the wood laminate that is now in the apartment is pretty damaged). The least expensive two bedroom is on the 31st floor and is offered for $429,900 with marble floors. The most expensive two bedroom is the same floor plan on the 36th floor for $525,000 that has been completely remodeled.

On the west side, we have seen 3 closed sales since the beginning of the year. These have closed at an average of $323/square foot and the sellers have received an average of 96% of their asking price. The least expensive was unit 1602, which is a 1 bedroom that sold for $260,000. I found the listing photos of this unit to be very misleading. The agent took photos of the bay view from the pool deck but did not specify that they were not taken from the unit itself. An uneducated or underrepresented buyer could easily be led astray with photos like this. Tsk tsk.

There are not any sales listings that currently have pending contracts. I have a feeling we will see some price reductions from those who need to sell.

SOUTH FACING UNITS

The south side of the building is interesting because Aria on the Bay is being constructed next door, so many of the sellers purchased their units when the view was very much different. The view is still pretty, just the water view is not as expansive as it once was. There are currently 8 available sales at an average price per foot of $343. The only closed sale this year in this section of the building was unit 2212, which is a 1,374 square foot 2 bedroom layout that sold for $435,000 ($316/square foot).

Just a few floors up, unit 2712 is currently awaiting closing and was listed for $324/square foot. Since buyers are settling for 96% of the asking price, it looks like we’re due for some price reductions before things start to move.

EAST FACING UNITS

The east view at 1800 Club is really a money-maker. All of the plans on the east side are 2 bedroom layouts and 11 are currently available at an average price of $488/square foot. The actual listing prices are $489,000 up to $620,000.

Something interesting that I found is that the only closed sale on this side of the building was unit 1807, which closed for $545,000 ($445/square foot). The lowest price of the available units is unit 1403, a 2 bedroom with 1,142 square feet for $489,000 ($428/square foot). DEAL ALERT!!!

There are two 3 bedroom units available, but I really don’t have anything to compare them to. One is a furnished 01 line that is on the 8th floor (below the pool deck). The other is a 3,082 square foot duplex loft on the pool level. They are listed for $975,000 and $1.29 million, respectively.

Overall, the building is looking at 27 months of inventory based upon closed sales rates. While that’s not a great number, it is far healthier than some of the other buildings we’ve dug into over recent weeks. There have been a total of 6 closed sales in the overall building with an average price of $328/square foot. With 3 closings on the west side, one on the east side, one on the north side and one that was an outlier (it was on level 3 with a very different floor plan), the less expensive west side is the busier side currently. Since there is nothing pending over there at this point, it will be interesting to see what the summer brings us.

WHAT ABOUT RENTALS?

Just like the buildings we’ve seen over recent weeks, the rental market is still healthy at 1800 Club. There is just under 4 months of inventory on the market (20 active listings and 24 have rented since the beginning of the year). The listings are fetching 99% of their asking price and the listings are staying active for just under 60 days on average.

Now as an investor, you’re probably thinking that 60 days is a long marketing period but also consider that many of the listings are activated 30 days before the previous tenant vacates. The paperwork process of moving a new tenant into the building typically takes 3 weeks, so the 60 days on the market statistic isn’t really so bad.

One bedrooms are fetching $1,750/month and up right now, two bedrooms with west views are bringing $2,450/month. The only north facing unit that is available is an enormous 1,810 square foot 2 bedroom that is available for $3,500/month. East views are available for $2,800/month.

From an investment standpoint, I’m giving 1800 Club a gold star. Mortgages are available in the building, layouts are attractive to tenants (and owner/occupants), the building is well-run, the finishes are nice, the location is top notch and the views are beautiful. Pretending that we purchased that $260,000 one bedroom (the least expensive recent sale) and leased it for $1,750/month (the least expensive 1 bedroom recent rental), it would work out to a 4-5% return rate after expenses. Those are really great numbers for the area!

Which building should we look into next week???

Market Stat Monday: Quantum on the Bay

After the positive reviews of my Miami Riverfront Market Statistics article last week and similar feedback to previous market stat posts, I’ve decided to try something new and make it a regular thing. Monday is now Market Stat Monday on the Miami Condos Blog. Each week, I’ll take a look at a different neighborhood, area, or a building. If you have a building or area that you would like to see featured, just let me know. I’m happy to do it and enjoy digging in the numbers.

One of our social media followers suggested that I take a look at what’s going on in Quantum on the Bay. I haven’t written about Quantum in awhile, so agree that it a good place to start. For those who don’t know, Quantum on the Bay was developed by Terra back in 2008. It is located across the street from Margaret Pace Park and is situated in a way that most every apartment has at least a partial bay view, but many have a big, open view of the bay. Because of the park, it used to be a very popular place for people with pets, but the condo association stopped allowing pets for tenants. Owners may have pets, but not tenants (unless you have a support animal). The building has 2 towers and 698 residences.

Despite the beautiful views and convenient location, Quantum has not been free from drama. They had to sue the developer in order to be repaid for the repair of some construction defects. They won that lawsuit and threw a party. The party was barely cleaned up before a tenant slapped the association with a lawsuit for price gouging on move-in fees. I was really wondering how long it was going to take for that to happen somewhere. Almost all of the buildings do it and the tenants always complain but nobody has gotten mad enough to actually sue over a few hundred dollars.

SALES MARKET

So, let’s see how the building is doing. There are currently 86 active sales listings in Quantum. That’s just over 12% of the building, which isn’t so bad. But with only 7 closed sales this year, that’s 43 months of inventory. On the bright side, the units that did sell received 96% of their asking price, so at least it’s not a bloodbath. There is just a lot of competition for buyers, who are more scarce.

The units that closed did so for an average of $357/square foot. The least expensive was a 1 bedroom on the 36^th floor for $250,000. In an interesting turn of events, a 3 bedroom with 1,620 square feet sold for $535,000, less than a two bedroom with a direct bay view. The two bedroom sold for $540,000 on the 27^th floor and another for $570,000 on the 39^th floor. That’s interesting to see how a direct bay view does affect the price of an apartment more so than an additional bedroom. 1,620 square feet is really an enormous apartment in this area. There are 8 contracts waiting to close.

For the buyers who are still looking, there are studios available with partial bay views starting at $220,000, a one bedroom on the 40^th floor with a partial bay view is offered starting at $257,000 and two bedrooms with partial bay views start at $380,000. Three bedrooms start at $524,000 or $350/square foot and there is a 3 bedroom penthouse available for $950,000. These prices are relatively the same as they were two years ago (when I last had an active buyer in the building). I’ll save the trends for a future post.

RENTAL MARKET

Just like at the Miami Riverfront, Quantum on the Bay’s rental market is also far healthier than the sales market. There have been 54 rentals this year so far at 98% of the asking price. The average price of a closed rental is $2.37/square foot. The individual prices were:

Studios: As low as $1,500/month.

One bedrooms: Starting at $1,675 for a 35^th floor apartment with 663 square feet and a little bit of a water view.

Two bedrooms: There was one rental at $2,250 for a two bedroom, but I have a feeling this one is an outlier. The remarks said that the property had to be taken “as-is”, so I imagine it was either filthy, needed painting or had something else wrong with it. The next least expensive unit was 2711, which rented for $2,300/month with a partial bay view.

Three bedrooms: as low as $3,100/month.

There are 38 available rentals listed, so just under 3 months of inventory for tenants. There are 18 units that have a contract signed and are waiting for move-in day.

All in all, it looks like things are picking up for Quantum. I feel like that once the association straightens up and the lawsuit over their application fees settles, the sales market will pick up also. Litigation makes things very difficult for sellers, since most banks will not finance transactions in buildings with legal drama.

We’ll see you next week with another report! Which building or area should we dig into next week?

Investing In Condos For AirBnb Income Is A Risky Idea

Despite Miami Beach’s crackdown on AirBnb properties, we receive regular calls from hopeful investors who want to buy properties in order to lease them out on the short term rental website. It is important to understand the risks involved in breaking the rules with hopes of high returns.

Miami Beach Crackdown

Because AirBnb rentals do not contribute to the hotel taxes that largely fund Miami Beach and they take away from the bookings at hotels, they are strictly outlawed. The government is in the midst of a strict crackdown of the policy, levying $20,000 fines on investors who break the rules. That’s $20,000 PER OFFENSE. Unless you’re leasing a $25 million waterfront mansion for $8,000/night to Kylie Jenner, the risk is just not worth the reward.

It was also announced yesterday on The New Times that Miami is considering a similar crackdown.

Condo Regulations

Many condo associations prohibit rentals of less than 30 days, or even less than 6 months. Some older buildings require owners to wait 1 to 2 years before leasing their condos. It is important to be clear about the rental policies of buildings prior to investing, because your bottom line will be affected if the policies don’t line up with your investment goals.

But what happens if you ignore the condo association rules and continue to lease your property on AirBnb? According to our contact at the management office at Infinity at Brickell, where the minimum lease term is 6 months, fines of $100 per infraction are issued to the owners of the apartments that get caught. He said that it is also not uncommon for visitors to be given violations for failure to obey conduct and noise rules in addition to giving themselves up for being nightly renters by treating the front desk like a front desk at a hotel. Eventually, the fines add up to make the investment not profitable enough to continue.

Some other buildings are taking enforcement a step further. Mint at Riverfront requires each applicant to sign an acknowledgment of the rules pertaining to short term rentals. MarinaBlue has posted a sign at the front desk alerting visitors that short term rentals are prohibited and violators will be removed from the premises.

With condo buildings, the issue is about security rather than the hotel tax. Each resident in a condo building must undergo a background check to ensure the safety of all residents. If one condo owner (or tenant) sublets their unit to vacationers, this security measure is compromised.

Renting A Condo To Use As AirBnb Rental Investment

The investors we’ve seen are not only buyers who purchase with the intention to run a short term rental business. We have also seen entrepreneurial tenants inquiring about a strategy of leasing a furnished condo and then subletting it online. This is not only a violation of the City (if the property is in Miami Beach) and condo association policies, but it is a violation of the lease terms. Most Florida leases do not allow subletting, putting the tenant at risk of eviction and penalties.

Landlords who keep yearly tenants have already picked up on this strategy and have begun to screen potential tenants for risk of violation of the subletting section of the lease, but I anticipate more buildings will follow suit with Mint and MarinaBlue over the coming months even if the City of Miami fails to pass their ordinance outlawing short term rentals.

******Update: One Miami East and West have both jumped on the bandwagon with the following stern message to residents, sent today.

February 16, 2017


Dear One Miami Residents,

As the Associations have previously notified you, short term rentals are not permitted in One Miami for periods of less than thirty (30) days.  Despite such prior notifications, we have received numerous complaints that certain owners and tenants are in fact renting their units for short term stays in direct violation of the Associations’ governing documents, whether through websites like Airbnb or on their own.  The Associations’ have sent (and will continue to send) violation letters to such owners and tenants who are committing these short-term rental violations instructing them to cease and desist from such actions immediately.  The next step will likely be for the Associations to file lawsuit(s) against such owner(s) or tenant(s) without further notice.  The Associations also reserve the right to deny access to any such unauthorized parties who may be renting from owners on a short-term basis.

We again remind all Members that the Associations’ take such issue very seriously.  Therefore, if you are engaging in such improper conduct, please cease and desist from the same immediately.  Additionally, if you are aware of a short-term rental violation that is occurring in the building, please report the same to management.  Thank you for your assistance.

Sincerely,

Board of Directors of:
One Miami East Condominium Association, Inc.
One Miami West Condominium Association, Inc.
One Miami Master Association, Inc.

January 2017 Brickell Real Estate Market Update

This is a very interesting time in Miami’s real estate market and we are going to start doing more regular market updates of the various neighborhoods and even individual buildings. We’ll start with Brickell, but don’t hesitate to reach out and make a request if there is a specific neighborhood or building that you are curious about.

SALES MARKET
January 2017 brought 41 closed sales in Brickell, according to MLS data, down from 66 in January of 2016. These were seller to buyer transactions, not developer to buyer transactions, since developer to buyer transactions are not reported in the MLS. We will do a separate post with developer-buyer transactions for each building as they open and the sales are recorded.

Although the number of transactions fell, the average price rose to $514,000 for those 41 closed sales. 2016’s average price was $500,000. The average price per square foot also rose to $412/square foot, up from $401/square foot last year. The condos that found buyers had an average time on the market of 163 days, last year was 114 days. It seems the longer marketing time and increasing inventory choices for buyers has made the sellers more eager to sell. The buyers who transacted were able to negotiate down to 92% of the asking price this January, down from 97% of the buyers who bought last January.

The most expensive listing that sold this month was Tower Suite 3801 in Reach at Brickell City Centre. It sold for $1.95M and was offered at $2.1M and the buyer was represented by our very own Lucas Lechuga. We did an in-depth look at the numbers from that transaction last week. The least expensive sale of the month was a $168,000 studio at Brickell’s original condo building, the Four Ambassador.

As of today, there are 1,888 active listings in Brickell (300 of which are new listings in January), averaging $725,000 and $508/square foot. If we continue selling at this rate, we have enough inventory for 46 months of business. With this amount of available alternatives for the buyers, the sellers who are eager to move on from their units need to not only price them aggressively but also hire an agent with strong marketing power so that you stand out from the crowd.

RENTAL MARKET
There were 306 new leases signed in January of this year, up from 264 in 2016. The average rental price is $2,466/month, basically the same as last year’s $2,440. The 306 landlords who found new tenants beat out the competition of 1,442 alternative active listings, 465 of which were new listings.

Although the number of transactions is up and the prices are holding firm, the marketing time is increased this year to an average of 79 days on the market. Last year it took an average of 65 days to find a new tenant and move them in.

Tenants should not smell blood in the water yet though. The 306 leases that were signed garnered 96% of the asking price, so lowballing isn’t a thing just yet. The landlords who are not into 2+ months of vacancy are pricing their units well and finding a tenant quickly.

The most expensive rental of the month was the Four Seasons Residences Unit 44C. That one rented for $9,750/month. The least expensive was a studio at The Club at Brickell Bay for $1,400. It is important to note that the entry-level apartments in the neighborhood are less likely to negotiate price. Brickell is increasingly a hot neighborhood, so the entry point options are very much in demand.

What trends do you anticipate for Brickell? Weigh in and we’ll follow back up next month!

2016 Year In Review: The Downtown Miami Area Condo Market (Brickell to Midtown)

Image courtesy of Wanderson Dos Santos

As the sun sets on 2016, let’s review our year in real estate. There have been a lot of reports about the slowing preconstruction market, but what about the resale and rental markets? Here’s a quick breakdown:

• Greater Downtown Miami (Brickell to Midtown/Edgewater) saw 1,485 closed transactions this year.
• Those transactions amounted to a total of $720 million.
• The average price per square foot of all sales ended up being $389/square foot.
• The most expensive sale was Pharrell Williams’ penthouse at Bristol Tower, sold by our Madrina herself, Dora Puig, for $9.25 million.
• Brickell’s Taj Mahal finally went into contract.
• There were 92 sales over $1 million, with an average price per square foot of $673.
• 6908 residential leases were signed. This does not include rental-only buildings, who do not report their closed rentals to the MLS.
• The most expensive rental was the 6 bedroom penthouse at Jade Residences at Brickell Bay for $25,000/month.
• There were just over 100 unicorns that rented for less than $1,450/month.
• This guy really screwed up his MarinaBlue apartment.

China didn’t show up the way everyone was hoping back in 2015. Chinese buyers only took 11 condos, according to MLS data. Here are the stats from other countries:

• Venezuela: 51
• Argentina: 50
• Brazil: 41
• Colombia: 40
• France: 13
• Mexico: 10
• Italy: 9
• India: 7
• UK: 7
• Spain: 5
• Russia: 2
• Japan: 2
• German: 1
• USA: 435!
• Undisclosed: 791 (We’re looking at you, 791 lazy Realtors. Please do better with logging your sales data in 2017 so that next year’s year-end post will be better.)

What other stats are you curious about? We would love to improve our content for 2017 and offer more of what you want.

IconBrickell Pool Closure Begins December 5

Over a year after we first reported the pool closure at IconBrickell, they have finally given the dates for the work to begin. In a letter to residents this week, the condo association has announced that starting December 5, the pool will be inaccessible for approximately 12 months. Surprisingly, the condo association did not make arrangements for an alternative pool for the residents.

Anticipation of the repair and special assessment have sent sale and rental prices in a tailspin. Sales prices in the last 90 days are averaging $426/square foot. Just a year ago, apartments in the project were closing at $584/square foot.

Rental prices have also been in free-fall. Unit 4103 in Tower 2 rented in 2015 for $5,300. This year, it rented for $3,800 after 5 months on the market. In Tower 1, unit 4104 rented this month for $2,000, down from the $2,600 that the landlord received last year. It doesn’t help matters that there are currently 180 available rentals on the market. Since 24 apartments rented in the last 30 days, it will take over 7 months to absorb all of this inventory.

On the bright side, this is a fantastic opportunity for investors who are looking for a long-term hold or for those who are looking for a great price on a vacation home. While the values are depressed now, I fully expect them to rebound when the amenity deck reopens. There are still plenty of sellers who need to move on from the properties for personal reasons, or investors who are not able to wait out the storm. How much lower do you anticipate the prices will fall? We are happy to help if this situation is an opportunity for your investment goals.

Tenant Sues Condo Association For Price Gouging On Application Fees

Quantum on the Bay

A tenant at Quantum on the Bay in the Omni district finally did something about the high application fees that are being charged to prospective tenants, according to the Miami Herald. He is suing them because their application fees are in excess of the $100 cap that the Florida statute issues.

This has been an ongoing problem for tenants in many of the Downtown area buildings for several years. Some condo associations use these elevated fees in order to avoid having to make a special assessment on the unit owners for repairs or upgrades. The association at Quantum once had a $400 application fee, but it was later reduced to $150 after so many potential tenants complained. In order to continue bringing the income that they once received from the application fees, they split it into the application fee plus the administrative fees. Some other buildings have ‘impact fees’ of $500, but Quantum is one of the highest priced buildings in the area for a tenant to apply for.

Even though it is not lawful for a building to charge these exorbitant fees to tenants, many still do. The tenants really have no choice but to accept the fees. Protesting only causes delay and added expenses. If they miss their move-in date, they would need to stay at a hotel until the issue is resolved and there is still no guarantee that it would be resolved in their favor without a lawsuit. The Government Affairs department of our Miami Association of Realtors has been lobbying in Tallahassee for some time already, trying to convince them to enforce the laws.

Now, most buildings also charge a security deposit for the common areas and for pets, but that is different. Security deposits are returned. We typically see a security deposit that is held through the duration of the lease in order to guarantee there will not be damage to the common areas, a smaller security deposit for the actual move to guarantee that the elevators and hallways are not damaged by the movers and/or a pet deposit to the building.

You can read more about the Florida Condominium Act here, so that you know your rights. While it seems that Quantum is being singled out, this is a large problem throughout the marketplace and something that we are striving to change. On a day to day basis, the best we can do is see that our clients get settled as peacefully and efficiently as possible. On a larger scale, we are very much a part of the efforts from the Miami Association of Realtors to bring change to this practice.